A good beginning is half done.
Bank Fees You Don’t Know You’re Paying
by David K. Randall
Friday, September 25, 2009provided by
Banks are cutting overdraft fees, but there are other hidden charges.
In the wake of the uproar over bank fees charged to debit card holders–and the looming threat of congressional action–banking giants Bank of America, JPMorgan Chase, and Wells Fargo have announced drastic changes to their overdraft policies.
What banking customers might be missing is that debit card overdraft fees are the tip of the iceberg. Banks nickel and dime their customers in numerous other ways that can easily cost the average person $100 or more per year. Adding insult, many of the fees are poorly disclosed and levied regardless of any action the customer does–or doesn’t–take.
"There is a long list of fees that people pay that doesn’t require any type of acknowledgment on the part of the consumer," said Greg McBride, a senior financial analyst at Bankrate.com. Here are five major areas of hidden bank revenues.
Balance Transfer Fees
Banks commonly mail out ads pitching low interest rates for customers willing to transfer credit card balances from another institution. What many don’t advertise is that there is often a balance transfer fee of between 3% and 5% hidden in the fine print.
"If you’re transferring a balance from a card with a rate of 15% to a card with a rate or 13%, but you’re paying a 3% admission fee, you’re not saving any money," McBride said. Moving a balance of $5,000 from one credit card to another with a slightly lower interest rate could result in a $150 charge being added to the balance that you owe and pay interest on.
If you’re thinking about switching to a card with a lower interest rate, ask the bank what type of transfer fees it charges. These fees are separate from the annual interest rate that you pay.
Cash Advances
Consumers who take cash advances from their credit cards will also be hit with a transaction fee that they might not have been expecting. As with balance transfers, cash advances often come with a fee that ranges between 3% and 5%. That’s not all.
"If cash advances weren’t costly enough with interest rates in the high teens, there’s no grace period, and the interest clock starts ticking right away," McBride said.
Foreign Currency Surcharges
Using a debit or credit card while traveling overseas is wonderfully convenient. Perhaps too convenient. Over the past few years, banks have commonly started charging a 3% fee for any purchases made in foreign currencies. That means if you go to Paris on vacation and buy presents in euros, the charges will show up on your statement in dollars–with the 3% fees built in.
If you plan to use a debit or credit card abroad, consider opening an account with Capital One or Charles Schwab, whose foreign currency exchange fees run as low as 1%. If you are going to be taking money out of an ATM in another country (another place where banks ring up additional charges), Wells Fargo and PNC offer some of the lowest fees.
Balance Requirements
Many banks offer to waive monthly service fees on checking or savings accounts if customers maintain a collective balance above a set minimum. Dip below it, and you could be hit with a charge of $8 or more every time your balance falls below the minimum.
"These requirements are really a lose-lose proposition," McBride says. "If you don’t maintain the balance, you get socked with a fee. If you do maintain it, you have the opportunity costs of stranding money in a low-yielding account when you could be earning a more competitive return in an online savings account."
ATM Fees
Bank of America and other banks now charge customers from other banks $3 to withdraw money from its ATMs. But at least you have to agree to pay the fee at the terminal. What some customers may not realize that is that their own bank often levies a $2 fee every time they use a competitor’s ATM as well. Adding up all the bank fees, it may cost $5 to take out $20 of your own money. That’s a 25% commission, and the bank didn’t have to do a thing.
Copyrighted, Forbes.com. All rights reserved.
No comments yet.
No trackbacks yet.
8 Investing Lessons From John Paulson
November 23, 2009 - 8:42 am
Posted in Business, Finance & Investment | 1 comment
Even as the financial system collapsed last year, and millions of investors lost billions of dollars, one unlikely investor was racking up historic profits: John Paulson, a hedge-fund manager in New York.
His firm made $20 billion between 2007 and early 2009 by betting against the housing market and big financial companies. Mr. Paulson’s personal cut [...]
Metallgesellschaft’s Case
November 19, 2009 - 6:48 am
Posted in Financial Risk Manager | 2 comments
Hi David,
I went thru this case and also your and Jacks discussion on the same but i could not get 1 simple concept clear. can you pls help me with a simple example
1) MG had Long position in short term futures.
2) Markets went into Contango.
3) Now if MG is in a long position he is locked it at a price say 20$.
4) Market goes into contango i.e futures price is above spot lets assume now its 25$.
5) Then actually MG is gaining as it had bought futures at 20$ and now the same is 25$
How is MG losing? Can you pls explain me in layman terms with the same example as i gave as i got utterly confused after i went thru the earlier thread.
Thx & Rgds
Amit
conversion factor
November 19, 2009 - 6:24 am
Posted in Financial Risk Manager | No comments
Hi David,
Could you pls clarify this question? I wonder why “as yields lower than 6% imply that the CF for long-term bonds is lower than otherwise. This will tend to favor bonds with high conversion factors, or shorter bonds”? what is the relationship between CF and maturity?
Thanks.
The Chicago Board of Trade has reduced the notional coupon of its Treasury
futures contracts from 8% to 6%. Which of the following statements are
likely to be true as a result of the change?
a. The cheapest-to-deliver status will become more unstable if yields hover
near the 6% range.
b. When yields fall below 6%, higher-duration bonds will become cheapest
to deliver, whereas lower-duration bonds will become cheapest to deliver
when yields range above 6%.
c. The 6% coupon would decrease the duration of the contract, making it
a more effective hedge for the long end of the yield curve.
d. There will be no impact at all by the change.
a. The goal of the CF is to equalize differences between various deliverable bonds.
In the extreme, if we discounted all bonds using the current term structure, the
CF would provide an exact offset to all bond prices, making all of the deliverable
bonds equivalent. This reduction from 8% to 6% notional reflects more closely
recent interest rates. It will lead to more instability in the CTD, which is exactly
the effect intended. Answer b) is not correct, as yields lower than 6% imply that
the CF for long-term bonds is lower than otherwise. This will tend to favor bonds
with high conversion factors, or shorter bonds. Also, a lower coupon increases the
duration of the contract, so c) is not correct.
Core Reading Versus AIMS
November 19, 2009 - 5:42 am
Posted in Financial Risk Manager | No comments
Hi all,
Are the core readings supposed to exactly mirror the reading lists given in the AIMS?
I purchased – and subsequently read – the printed copy of the Core readings for the Level 1 exam. However, looking through the AIMS I can see a lot of extra readings that weren’t provided in the Core reading pack. In particular, the Financial Markets & Products AIMS lists chapters 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,9,10 of Hull!! These were not provided in the Core readings pack – and translates into a lot of extra reading in very little time!
Thanks,
John
Regression
November 19, 2009 - 2:13 am
Posted in Financial Risk Manager | No comments
Consider 3 random variables X,Y,Z Suppose corr(x,y) =0.4 and corr(z,y)=0.3 which of the following statements is true?
a) corr(x,z) cannot be negative.
b) corr(x,z) has to be larger than 0.3
c) corr(x,z) cannot be negative
d) none of the above.
can u throw some light on this question.
thanks and do reply soon.
FRM L1 exam format
November 19, 2009 - 12:45 am
Posted in Financial Risk Manager | No comments
Hi there,
I have a question about the exam format for the L1.
I noticed that there will be 2 sessions (morning and afternoon), will this sessions have different chapters? (ie. morning session covers Foundation of RM and QA, afternoon session covers M&P and Valuation) or they are all mixed and have same format for the morning and afternoon.
Thanks in advance,
Jason
Why is small actual volatitlity profitable for a long call option?
November 19, 2009 - 12:07 am
Posted in Financial Risk Manager | 1 comment
Dear David,
Appreciate your enlightenment on the FRM handbook question (page 335 Example 13.3 5th edition) below. The book’s explanation is that the long call position is profitable when the actual volatility is small but this statement seems contradictory to what I’ve learned about long options that long a option is long implied volatility therefore it benefits from increasing volatility?
Example 13.3
A trader buys an at-the-money call option with the intention of delta-hedging it to maturity. Which one of the following is likely to be the most profitable over the life of the option?
A. An increase in implied volatility
B. The underlying price steadily rising over the life of the option
C. The underlying price steadily decreasing over the life of the option
D. The underlying price drifting back and forth around the strike over the life of the option
Answer Provided: D
Thanks
Liming
19/11/09
Black & Scholes Formula Changue for different instruments
November 18, 2009 - 11:22 pm
Posted in Financial Risk Manager | 3 comments
Hi David.
I have some questions.
In practice, can you teach me in spreedsheet, how changue the black & Schoels formula for: Options for shares that pays dividens, options on indexes and options on currency or Foreign Exchangue.
Saludos from MEXICO
GABRIEL
ABX protection buyer
November 18, 2009 - 9:02 pm
Posted in Financial Risk Manager | No comments
Hi David,
I wonder if ABX protection buyer shorts ABX? If so, if there is any credit loss, the protection buyer will compensate the buyer, and meanwhile the ABX price also drops, so the ABX protection buyer who shorts ABX also gains.. is this a double-dip? or I misunderstand something?
Thanks.
PRM Exam Question-Need help
November 18, 2009 - 6:36 pm
Posted in Financial Risk Manager | 1 comment
1) The provision for credit risk in calculated to cover
a. Expected losses
b. Expected and unexpected
c. Unexpected
d. None of the above
2) Marginal Economic Capital is a suboptimal method to analyze
a. The amount of capital consumed by an instrument
b. The movements of economic capital from one business to another on a
marginal basis
c. The marginal increase in the overall risk
d. The removal of the entire business which represents a significant
share of the total economic capital
3) Which of the following should be considered to compute the Gross
income indicator when using Basic indicator Approach as per BASEL 2
a. Income from Insurance
b. Operating expenses
c. Unrealized income and expenses
d. None of the above
4) Which of the following should be considered to compute the Gross
Income Indicator?
a. Income From insurance
b. Operating Expenses
c. Realized P&L from securities in the banking book
d. Unrealized P&L from securities in the banking book
5. Which is not typically included in casual based definition of OR
a. Strategic Planning
b. Legal Planning
c. People Systems
d. Inadequate or failed operations
6. The Altman credit risk approach is modeled by
a. Focusing only on firms that have defaulted
b. Focusing only on firms that have survived
c. Country accounting
d. Quadratic equation of various accounting measure
7. LGD is a function of
a. Capital Adequacy of counterparty
b. Seniority of the claims
c. Market movements between now and default
d. All
8 Let A & B be 2 uncorrelated risky portfolio with Normally
distributed returns. Their Ceteris Paribus is
a. VAR (A+B) = >VAR (A) + VAR (B)
b. VAR (A+B) < VAR (A) + VAR (B)
c. VAR (A+B) > = VAR (A) + VAR (B)
d. VAR (A+B) can be either > or < than VAR (A) + VAR(B)
Email responses to jason dot jason57 at gmail dot com