Hi David,

Could you pls clarify this question? I wonder why “as yields lower than 6% imply that the CF for long-term bonds is lower than otherwise. This will tend to favor bonds with high conversion factors, or shorter bonds”? what is the relationship between CF and maturity? 
Thanks.

  The Chicago Board of Trade has reduced the notional coupon of its Treasury
  futures contracts from 8% to 6%. Which of the following statements are
  likely to be true as a result of the change?
  a. The cheapest-to-deliver status will become more unstable if yields hover
  near the 6% range.
  b. When yields fall below 6%, higher-duration bonds will become cheapest
  to deliver, whereas lower-duration bonds will become cheapest to deliver
  when yields range above 6%.
  c. The 6% coupon would decrease the duration of the contract, making it
  a more effective hedge for the long end of the yield curve.
  d. There will be no impact at all by the change.

  a. The goal of the CF is to equalize differences between various deliverable bonds.
  In the extreme, if we discounted all bonds using the current term structure, the
  CF would provide an exact offset to all bond prices, making all of the deliverable
  bonds equivalent. This reduction from 8% to 6% notional reflects more closely
  recent interest rates. It will lead to more instability in the CTD, which is exactly
  the effect intended. Answer b) is not correct, as yields lower than 6% imply that
  the CF for long-term bonds is lower than otherwise. This will tend to favor bonds
  with high conversion factors, or shorter bonds. Also, a lower coupon increases the
  duration of the contract, so c) is not correct.

, , , , , , ,
Trackback

no comment untill now

Add your comment now