November 23, 2009 - 8:42 am
Posted in Business, Finance & Investment | 1 comment
Even as the financial system collapsed last year, and millions of investors lost billions of dollars, one unlikely investor was racking up historic profits: John Paulson, a hedge-fund manager in New York.
His firm made $20 billion between 2007 and early 2009 by betting against the housing market and big financial companies. Mr. Paulson’s personal cut [...]
November 19, 2009 - 6:48 am
Posted in Financial Risk Manager | 2 comments
Hi David,
I went thru this case and also your and Jacks discussion on the same but i could not get 1 simple concept clear. can you pls help me with a simple example
1) MG had Long position in short term futures.
2) Markets went into Contango.
3) Now if MG is in a long position he is locked it at a price say 20$.
4) Market goes into contango i.e futures price is above spot lets assume now its 25$.
5) Then actually MG is gaining as it had bought futures at 20$ and now the same is 25$
How is MG losing? Can you pls explain me in layman terms with the same example as i gave as i got utterly confused after i went thru the earlier thread.
Thx & Rgds
Amit
November 19, 2009 - 6:47 am
Posted in Business, Finance & Investment | No comments
by David K. Randall Friday, September 25, 2009provided by
Banks are cutting overdraft fees, but there are other hidden charges.
In the wake of the uproar over bank fees charged to debit card holders–and the looming threat of congressional action–banking giants Bank of America, JPMorgan Chase, and Wells Fargo have announced drastic changes [...]
November 19, 2009 - 5:42 am
Posted in Financial Risk Manager | No comments
Hi all,
Are the core readings supposed to exactly mirror the reading lists given in the AIMS?
I purchased – and subsequently read – the printed copy of the Core readings for the Level 1 exam. However, looking through the AIMS I can see a lot of extra readings that weren’t provided in the Core reading pack. In particular, the Financial Markets & Products AIMS lists chapters 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,9,10 of Hull!! These were not provided in the Core readings pack – and translates into a lot of extra reading in very little time!
Thanks,
John
November 19, 2009 - 2:13 am
Posted in Financial Risk Manager | No comments
Consider 3 random variables X,Y,Z Suppose corr(x,y) =0.4 and corr(z,y)=0.3 which of the following statements is true?
a) corr(x,z) cannot be negative.
b) corr(x,z) has to be larger than 0.3
c) corr(x,z) cannot be negative
d) none of the above.
can u throw some light on this question.
thanks and do reply soon.
November 19, 2009 - 12:45 am
Posted in Financial Risk Manager | No comments
Hi there,
I have a question about the exam format for the L1.
I noticed that there will be 2 sessions (morning and afternoon), will this sessions have different chapters? (ie. morning session covers Foundation of RM and QA, afternoon session covers M&P and Valuation) or they are all mixed and have same format for the morning and afternoon.
Thanks in advance,
Jason
November 19, 2009 - 12:07 am
Posted in Financial Risk Manager | 1 comment
Dear David,
Appreciate your enlightenment on the FRM handbook question (page 335 Example 13.3 5th edition) below. The book’s explanation is that the long call position is profitable when the actual volatility is small but this statement seems contradictory to what I’ve learned about long options that long a option is long implied volatility therefore it benefits from increasing volatility?
Example 13.3
A trader buys an at-the-money call option with the intention of delta-hedging it to maturity. Which one of the following is likely to be the most profitable over the life of the option?
A. An increase in implied volatility
B. The underlying price steadily rising over the life of the option
C. The underlying price steadily decreasing over the life of the option
D. The underlying price drifting back and forth around the strike over the life of the option
Answer Provided: D
Thanks
Liming
19/11/09
November 18, 2009 - 11:22 pm
Posted in Financial Risk Manager | 3 comments
Hi David.
I have some questions.
In practice, can you teach me in spreedsheet, how changue the black & Schoels formula for: Options for shares that pays dividens, options on indexes and options on currency or Foreign Exchangue.
Saludos from MEXICO
GABRIEL
November 18, 2009 - 9:02 pm
Posted in Financial Risk Manager | No comments
Hi David,
I wonder if ABX protection buyer shorts ABX? If so, if there is any credit loss, the protection buyer will compensate the buyer, and meanwhile the ABX price also drops, so the ABX protection buyer who shorts ABX also gains.. is this a double-dip? or I misunderstand something?
Thanks.
November 18, 2009 - 6:36 pm
Posted in Financial Risk Manager | 1 comment
1) The provision for credit risk in calculated to cover
a. Expected losses
b. Expected and unexpected
c. Unexpected
d. None of the above
2) Marginal Economic Capital is a suboptimal method to analyze
a. The amount of capital consumed by an instrument
b. The movements of economic capital from one business to another on a
marginal basis
c. The marginal increase in the overall risk
d. The removal of the entire business which represents a significant
share of the total economic capital
3) Which of the following should be considered to compute the Gross
income indicator when using Basic indicator Approach as per BASEL 2
a. Income from Insurance
b. Operating expenses
c. Unrealized income and expenses
d. None of the above
4) Which of the following should be considered to compute the Gross
Income Indicator?
a. Income From insurance
b. Operating Expenses
c. Realized P&L from securities in the banking book
d. Unrealized P&L from securities in the banking book
5. Which is not typically included in casual based definition of OR
a. Strategic Planning
b. Legal Planning
c. People Systems
d. Inadequate or failed operations
6. The Altman credit risk approach is modeled by
a. Focusing only on firms that have defaulted
b. Focusing only on firms that have survived
c. Country accounting
d. Quadratic equation of various accounting measure
7. LGD is a function of
a. Capital Adequacy of counterparty
b. Seniority of the claims
c. Market movements between now and default
d. All
8 Let A & B be 2 uncorrelated risky portfolio with Normally
distributed returns. Their Ceteris Paribus is
a. VAR (A+B) = >VAR (A) + VAR (B)
b. VAR (A+B) < VAR (A) + VAR (B)
c. VAR (A+B) > = VAR (A) + VAR (B)
d. VAR (A+B) can be either > or < than VAR (A) + VAR(B)
Email responses to jason dot jason57 at gmail dot com